I went to visit a woman I know in the hospital this morning. She had surgery for cancer, which she has been battling for six years. This sounds like it was a difficult operation, as they had to separate her windpipe from her lung. She's been cancer-free in those six years, but about a month ago a tumor showed up on her brain, which they got rid of with gamma rays, and now this one. She was still a little out of it from the pain medication, and at one point said "we're worthy, we'll all be worthy" as she was drifting in and out. I have faith she'll make it, but this fight has been difficult it seems.
Another man I knew, a friend though not in my close circle, was murdered last week. A lot of people I know are trying to make sense of it, but I don't know what sense there is to make. Senseless crimes by their nature don't make sense. It's a horrible crime, and it's knocked all of us off-balance, some more than others.
I'm not inured to either of these incidents. There has been a lot of death lately, from the woman I know who died of cancer last month, to the husband of a work colleague who was shot at LAX last week. I cannot make any sense of it. I've never been able to.
For better or worse, I've certainly been acquainted with loss, and premature loss. Sometimes a surfeit of those losses makes you look around the corner in fear of what comes next. I've certainly spent nights just worrying that people I love would be killed, or I would be, or unexpectedly die. I've learned that a constant cognizance of my mortality serves to freeze me rather than free me.
On the other hand, if I'm present, and let the emotions that happen come and go as they need, I come away with a kind of hard-won gratitude. Instead of mourning eventual, inevitable loss, I begin to look around at what I'm thankful for. I have much to be thankful for. I'm not sure what I'm thankful to, but I know I am thankful for. When I'm in that place, I actually have a chance to forget that terrifying, unexplainable things happen all the time. I can start to see that wondrous, unexplainable things happen as well.
I was talking with a friend about hospital germs as we walked into the hospital. I was telling him about the microbiome about which we're discovering more and more. We have billions of organisms in us and around us that possibly effect everything from our thoughts, our weight, to our susceptibility to illness and moods. We are each a universe, an undiscovered, uncharted universe, quite literally. We are just beginning to see what we're made of, and how much we don't know.
When I look around at grief, sadness, and senselessness everywhere, I know I can't expect to have it explained or hope to avoid it, anymore than I can hope to avoid my own mortality. I can, though, walk around in my universe with a sense of wonder that we're here at all, and be thankful that I get to meet others along the way, with all our struggles, for a long or short time. For that, I'm thankful.
Friday, November 29, 2013
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Jackrabbit
I saw a giant jackrabbit last night. In my dreams.
This is odd, as I've never dreamed of rabbits. I may have written about this before, but I have vivid dreams that I often remember. There are the recurring dreams I used to have, either trying to place a giant contact in my eye that would not fit, or speeding down a curving road unable to open my eyes. Scary. I don't have those anymore, thankfully. The only thing close to recurring was a terrifying dream in which friends had left me their apartment but it was haunted by two evil sisters. They came back in another house a few months later, but had calmed down quite a bit. They were dressed well this time, and though unwilling to leave, they seemed a little easier to live with.
There are the surreal dreams: people floating down green rivers in China to stand up in Best Buy clothing and say "welcome to home depot"; the flying dream where a deceased friend came with me and we bounced up in the air and tried to teach other people how to do it.
Then the mundane dreams, the ones I sometimes remember years later when I'm in them. They usually make no sense, and then years later I'm in the situation - this has happened to me only two or three times. It's always neat to remember having told someone of a non-sensical dream and have it happen years later. Hopefully I won't work at Home Depot. For a while I used to think this would mean I was going to die, but since that hasn't happened yet, I figure it doesn't mean that anymore, at least. I had one dream where I was laughing with a young girl and very in love with her father. That was a sweet one. Who knows if these are dreams, fantasies, or possible futures - in any case they're interesting because they're mundane. I was even directing Melanie Griffith in one. That would be fun.
Last night, though, I saw a jackrabbit. He was the size of a deer, and was on my hood while I was driving. He stared at me for a good long time, and I stared at him, but I was ultimately concerned mostly with shaking him off my hood. After he got his fill of looking, he hopped away, enormous and unconcerned. Good omen, or just a dream with a giant rabbit? Like any meaning maker, I can decide to ascribe meaning or not, I suppose. He seemed an indifferent rabbit, but I wouldn't mind seeing him again.
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Tom Cat
I just heard a version of this song. I've liked Laura Nyro for a long time - she's such a New York poet. There's something about these chords that just evoke New York. Perhaps I lean toward it from having lived there, but some songs feel like they belong there. This is one of those. The chords feel like a cloudy, restless day in New York. I miss those days, the days when it rains and the water stays on the street and the clouds don't clear.
I love the rain in LA, how it storms and clears, revealing a crystal sky where even the clouds seem content and smiling - fresh with the breeze. Rain in New York doesn't always clear, and the night in the city reflects the water everywhere. Galoshes are needed. It evaporates at some point, but the sky can stay gray, blocking the sun from doing it's job. Rain in New York is moody. You can't help but feel it, too. I miss that sometimes.
Not enough to move back, but still...there are those songs....
Presbycusis
Fancy word, huh?
It means "age-related hearing loss." I have it. I listened to country music and musical theater so loudly in my walkman (remember those) in New York so loud that I gave myself tinnitus. That fancy word means I have a constant ringing in my ears. This is really only a problem when I'm looking for silence, which is a good amount of time.
I'm currently listening to a programmed Pandora channel based on Audra MacDonald, so it's heavy on musical theater and specifically musical theater women. It's a little dramatic, but I can only hear the ringing during the pianissimo parts. I've gotten pretty good at ignoring.
What I'm not as good at ignoring is difficulty breathing, which I am having at this moment. I like to ignore that I have bad allergies and mild asthma. I've had them both since I was a kid. The asthma used to be worse, but it's reared it's head again here in LA. I like to pretend I'm not asthmatic, but that's at my own risk. This seems to be a coldish kind of thing that settled in my chest. I'd prefer not to take another antibiotic, so I'm hoping to muscle my way through it.
I have some belief that I will find the right combination of sugar and wheat-free living with appropriate exercise that will magically cure me of being an allergic asthmatic with tinnitus. An ear-ringing, wheezing man in his 40s. I guess the possibility of that happening are slim.
I've never been great at acceptance. Tonight's a night I have to accept it. But knowing me, I'll wake up tomorrow to dream again.
It means "age-related hearing loss." I have it. I listened to country music and musical theater so loudly in my walkman (remember those) in New York so loud that I gave myself tinnitus. That fancy word means I have a constant ringing in my ears. This is really only a problem when I'm looking for silence, which is a good amount of time.
I'm currently listening to a programmed Pandora channel based on Audra MacDonald, so it's heavy on musical theater and specifically musical theater women. It's a little dramatic, but I can only hear the ringing during the pianissimo parts. I've gotten pretty good at ignoring.
What I'm not as good at ignoring is difficulty breathing, which I am having at this moment. I like to ignore that I have bad allergies and mild asthma. I've had them both since I was a kid. The asthma used to be worse, but it's reared it's head again here in LA. I like to pretend I'm not asthmatic, but that's at my own risk. This seems to be a coldish kind of thing that settled in my chest. I'd prefer not to take another antibiotic, so I'm hoping to muscle my way through it.
I have some belief that I will find the right combination of sugar and wheat-free living with appropriate exercise that will magically cure me of being an allergic asthmatic with tinnitus. An ear-ringing, wheezing man in his 40s. I guess the possibility of that happening are slim.
I've never been great at acceptance. Tonight's a night I have to accept it. But knowing me, I'll wake up tomorrow to dream again.
Wednesday, November 06, 2013
Success?
Sometimes, if I'm driving on Sunday morning, I catch a bit of the TED radio hour on NPR. The program this Sunday, and the one the link is for, is about success.
It was an interesting hour - Tony Robbins talking about drive; a woman who won a MacArthur Genius grant for studying grit; Alain de Botton on how overrated the idea of success is - or what a trap it is. Many voices. During de Botton's talk, he mentioned how success in anything and family/relationships are opposed to each other - that people with healthy relationships cannot be fabulously successful, and vice versa. One of the two suffers.
Laying aside where this information comes from, or even if it is correct, my big question is why we ask these questions or come up with these theories. Every day there is a new article about the habits of successful people, what they do and don't do, what they can have an can't have. I read an article recently about how writers cannot be good parents. Of course, the subjects were all straight men, and more than a few alcoholics, but the takeaway was that writers could not be good parents. Once again, whether or not, from the random sampling of alcoholic mid-century men they drew from, is true - what's the point of asking the question? At the end of it is the idea that there are limits to what can be done, that some things are not possible, that you cannot strive to have a balanced life, have healthy relationships, and be successful in an endeavor you choose.
To be fair, they were speaking of ridiculously "successful" people - titans of industry and scions of the arts. Still, though, what does an answer, even if it's flawed, lead us to? Another metric to judge your own progress, and another way to evaluate you own choices? Most of it does not lead to good valuation, and a good deal of it leads to a book purchase. A book purchase like "Don't just do something, sit there", a manifesto for slow living. We now need books to tell us how to slow down, to not take it so seriously, and wish we had the the idea to write a book about just chilling out so we could have become a rich, successful author. I'm sort of joking.
Maybe it's study fatigue, but truly being successful might be listening to yourself and where you're pointed, rather than someone saying what is and isn't possible. There have been many artists with tortured family lives, and there have been many with brilliantly happy ones. There are awful people who are great successes, and wonderful people who are. And there are wonderful unsuccessful people and awful ones, too. No random survey can tell you what's possible, or what works for you.
In the end the program does make you look at what the idea of "success" is, and I'm glad they discussed it. Some restless spirits seem to never have enough, and what would look like "success" to a passerby looks to them like dismal failure. Others feel great just where they are.
There was a 75 year study on happiness and what makes people thrive released by Harvard this year. Sadly, all the subject were men, but it started in 1938, so a different time. In the end, it seemed that "success" in life boiled down to "warm personal relationships." It also mentioned how destructive alcoholism was, and the role parents play. And even though I like this study, I still don't know what we'll know from the question. We keep finding out what in our hearts we know already. We even have aphorisms - 'money can't buy happiness', 'all you need is love', 'be here now'.
I guess, if nothing else, it keeps us busy, right?
It was an interesting hour - Tony Robbins talking about drive; a woman who won a MacArthur Genius grant for studying grit; Alain de Botton on how overrated the idea of success is - or what a trap it is. Many voices. During de Botton's talk, he mentioned how success in anything and family/relationships are opposed to each other - that people with healthy relationships cannot be fabulously successful, and vice versa. One of the two suffers.
Laying aside where this information comes from, or even if it is correct, my big question is why we ask these questions or come up with these theories. Every day there is a new article about the habits of successful people, what they do and don't do, what they can have an can't have. I read an article recently about how writers cannot be good parents. Of course, the subjects were all straight men, and more than a few alcoholics, but the takeaway was that writers could not be good parents. Once again, whether or not, from the random sampling of alcoholic mid-century men they drew from, is true - what's the point of asking the question? At the end of it is the idea that there are limits to what can be done, that some things are not possible, that you cannot strive to have a balanced life, have healthy relationships, and be successful in an endeavor you choose.
To be fair, they were speaking of ridiculously "successful" people - titans of industry and scions of the arts. Still, though, what does an answer, even if it's flawed, lead us to? Another metric to judge your own progress, and another way to evaluate you own choices? Most of it does not lead to good valuation, and a good deal of it leads to a book purchase. A book purchase like "Don't just do something, sit there", a manifesto for slow living. We now need books to tell us how to slow down, to not take it so seriously, and wish we had the the idea to write a book about just chilling out so we could have become a rich, successful author. I'm sort of joking.
Maybe it's study fatigue, but truly being successful might be listening to yourself and where you're pointed, rather than someone saying what is and isn't possible. There have been many artists with tortured family lives, and there have been many with brilliantly happy ones. There are awful people who are great successes, and wonderful people who are. And there are wonderful unsuccessful people and awful ones, too. No random survey can tell you what's possible, or what works for you.
In the end the program does make you look at what the idea of "success" is, and I'm glad they discussed it. Some restless spirits seem to never have enough, and what would look like "success" to a passerby looks to them like dismal failure. Others feel great just where they are.
There was a 75 year study on happiness and what makes people thrive released by Harvard this year. Sadly, all the subject were men, but it started in 1938, so a different time. In the end, it seemed that "success" in life boiled down to "warm personal relationships." It also mentioned how destructive alcoholism was, and the role parents play. And even though I like this study, I still don't know what we'll know from the question. We keep finding out what in our hearts we know already. We even have aphorisms - 'money can't buy happiness', 'all you need is love', 'be here now'.
I guess, if nothing else, it keeps us busy, right?
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Funeral
I went to a funeral today. The woman who passed died of a virulent form of cancer that she contracted in June. I went with a work colleague who had also been introduced to my boss by her. Because of her both of us have jobs. I wanted to pay my respects, she had always been kind to me.
Her best friend spoke during the short ceremony, and spoke of all the memorial services they had been to together for friends in the 1980s. They had become a regular occurrence. I can only imagine his grief at saying goodbye to a friend he'd known for over three decades. He played a song they played at those memorials, sung by a famous singer I've met. Her nephew coincidentally works in my group.
To make the world even smaller, a friend who sells plots at that cemetery remembered the woman who was being buried, remembered working with her on her mother's memorial stone as it had been unique. She was sad to hear of her passing, and enjoyed working with her. I don't know why I take comfort in all these connections, but I do.
We drove to the top of the hill to inter the body into a wall. The small pine coffin was set to go into a large marble wall, adjacent to her parents. In lieu of dirt, the man who had been her closest friend gave out white roses for people to place on the casket. He struggled with the thorns. A much older woman who had been her neighbor stood up to read a poem about ship, which meant a lot to her. The man who was her best friend passed out sheets of paper with a poem he wanted to hand out and read as well. When they handed it out I read it. I can't have a piece of text in my hand and not read it. I couldn't follow, couldn't comprehend. It felt as inconsequential as the paper it was printed on.
Any grief brings to the forefront the losses one has already suffered. The pain is universal, the moment specific. The moment is universal, the pain specific. It bleeds into other memories until it encompasses what's around it. Tears sharpen colors; you are aware of the ground you are standing on. What is mundane falls away in the face of a universal truth.
The man read the poem, which had also been a favorite in the 80s. The poet had died young, full of unfulfilled promise. He was overcome for a moment. I could feel his pain reading this particular poem at the service for someone with whom he had survived, with whom he had a long shared history. Someone who was taken unexpectedly, and too young. He was a survivor of cancer himself. I've known people who have survived, and those who haven't. It is impossible.
A girl standing next to me dropped her water bottle and giggled from embarrassment with her mother, with whom she had been crying moments before. Grief knocks up against laughter somehow; any relief is welcome. The group placed roses on the pine box and it was elevated and lifted into the sepulcher. We watched as two workmen pushed the body to where it would rest on the wall.
A man I know was asked to recite the mourner's kaddish, which he recited it in English. The prayer, said at most services for those remembering lost loved ones, is about the magnificence of God, the praise to him. A blessing and piece for all, for Israel. The words felt inconsequential. I mouthed what I knew of the Aramaic original under my breath, wanting to hear that rhythm. Thankfully, someone asked for the man from the cemetery to speak it in the original language. Perhaps because I know it well, I get some sense of comfort from it, the intonations, the parts led and those spoken together.
Grief is too big. Words are drops of rain on a roof. We can't not speak, but we can't wholly define the ineffable enormity of what we are feeling. We keep trying.
Her best friend spoke during the short ceremony, and spoke of all the memorial services they had been to together for friends in the 1980s. They had become a regular occurrence. I can only imagine his grief at saying goodbye to a friend he'd known for over three decades. He played a song they played at those memorials, sung by a famous singer I've met. Her nephew coincidentally works in my group.
To make the world even smaller, a friend who sells plots at that cemetery remembered the woman who was being buried, remembered working with her on her mother's memorial stone as it had been unique. She was sad to hear of her passing, and enjoyed working with her. I don't know why I take comfort in all these connections, but I do.
We drove to the top of the hill to inter the body into a wall. The small pine coffin was set to go into a large marble wall, adjacent to her parents. In lieu of dirt, the man who had been her closest friend gave out white roses for people to place on the casket. He struggled with the thorns. A much older woman who had been her neighbor stood up to read a poem about ship, which meant a lot to her. The man who was her best friend passed out sheets of paper with a poem he wanted to hand out and read as well. When they handed it out I read it. I can't have a piece of text in my hand and not read it. I couldn't follow, couldn't comprehend. It felt as inconsequential as the paper it was printed on.
Any grief brings to the forefront the losses one has already suffered. The pain is universal, the moment specific. The moment is universal, the pain specific. It bleeds into other memories until it encompasses what's around it. Tears sharpen colors; you are aware of the ground you are standing on. What is mundane falls away in the face of a universal truth.
The man read the poem, which had also been a favorite in the 80s. The poet had died young, full of unfulfilled promise. He was overcome for a moment. I could feel his pain reading this particular poem at the service for someone with whom he had survived, with whom he had a long shared history. Someone who was taken unexpectedly, and too young. He was a survivor of cancer himself. I've known people who have survived, and those who haven't. It is impossible.
A girl standing next to me dropped her water bottle and giggled from embarrassment with her mother, with whom she had been crying moments before. Grief knocks up against laughter somehow; any relief is welcome. The group placed roses on the pine box and it was elevated and lifted into the sepulcher. We watched as two workmen pushed the body to where it would rest on the wall.
A man I know was asked to recite the mourner's kaddish, which he recited it in English. The prayer, said at most services for those remembering lost loved ones, is about the magnificence of God, the praise to him. A blessing and piece for all, for Israel. The words felt inconsequential. I mouthed what I knew of the Aramaic original under my breath, wanting to hear that rhythm. Thankfully, someone asked for the man from the cemetery to speak it in the original language. Perhaps because I know it well, I get some sense of comfort from it, the intonations, the parts led and those spoken together.
Grief is too big. Words are drops of rain on a roof. We can't not speak, but we can't wholly define the ineffable enormity of what we are feeling. We keep trying.
Monday, October 21, 2013
Books and worms
When I was in Palm Springs this weekend, I impulsively bought Elizabeth Gilbert's new novel, which is being described as a ripping yarn about an independent woman of the 19th century. It's supposedly exhaustively researched, and breathlessly exciting. I'm hoping so.
Right now, I'm adding it to the pile, which just a cursory look at my bookshelf includes
IQ84
A Beautiful Mind
Patti Lupone's Memoir
God, A Biogra[y
Let the Great World Spin
A Great Unrecorded History: A new life of E.M. Forster
A Walk in the Woods
Why Does the World Exist
And that's just in front on the stacks. I can't help it. I'm a bookworm from way back. I have 3 books in my car at the moment. I've been reading Far From the Tree for about months because it kind of breaks my heart every time I open it. I read "Rapture Practice" in one day. I still haven't found my reading rhythm in LA after ten years, but I'm finding I'm much more likely to come home and crack open a book than I am to turn on the TV. Luckily, I got rid of my DVR; it was a higher pressured bookshelf, as the programs would expire. Now it's all streaming. Without the pressure, I think I watch more.
I guess to take its place, I re-upped my subscription to the New Yorker, since I missed it in print. Luckily, those don't expire, but they do stack up like titles on a TiVo.
All this is to say, I don't have any business buying more books at the moment. And yet, there are so many of interest. What can you do?
The other worms I've been thinking about are ear worms, those phrases of songs that get stuck in your ear for days, refusing to leave. Kelly Clarkson's "Because of You" bops into my head fairly frequently. The last couple of weeks it has been Miley Cyrus, god help me.
It must be how our brains work, recycling bits of catchiness that runs in the background like Muzak in a grocery store that we leave humming without even knowing we've heard. I imagine all the books on my bookshelf started that way, with the thought equivalent that kept someone up, haunted them, hummed in the background until they finally wrote it down. It can happen with words, stories, memories, images. Somethings lodge in our heads and just won't let go.
I like reading of others. It gives me some relief from my own.
Right now, I'm adding it to the pile, which just a cursory look at my bookshelf includes
IQ84
A Beautiful Mind
Patti Lupone's Memoir
God, A Biogra[y
Let the Great World Spin
A Great Unrecorded History: A new life of E.M. Forster
A Walk in the Woods
Why Does the World Exist
And that's just in front on the stacks. I can't help it. I'm a bookworm from way back. I have 3 books in my car at the moment. I've been reading Far From the Tree for about months because it kind of breaks my heart every time I open it. I read "Rapture Practice" in one day. I still haven't found my reading rhythm in LA after ten years, but I'm finding I'm much more likely to come home and crack open a book than I am to turn on the TV. Luckily, I got rid of my DVR; it was a higher pressured bookshelf, as the programs would expire. Now it's all streaming. Without the pressure, I think I watch more.
I guess to take its place, I re-upped my subscription to the New Yorker, since I missed it in print. Luckily, those don't expire, but they do stack up like titles on a TiVo.
All this is to say, I don't have any business buying more books at the moment. And yet, there are so many of interest. What can you do?
The other worms I've been thinking about are ear worms, those phrases of songs that get stuck in your ear for days, refusing to leave. Kelly Clarkson's "Because of You" bops into my head fairly frequently. The last couple of weeks it has been Miley Cyrus, god help me.
It must be how our brains work, recycling bits of catchiness that runs in the background like Muzak in a grocery store that we leave humming without even knowing we've heard. I imagine all the books on my bookshelf started that way, with the thought equivalent that kept someone up, haunted them, hummed in the background until they finally wrote it down. It can happen with words, stories, memories, images. Somethings lodge in our heads and just won't let go.
I like reading of others. It gives me some relief from my own.
Sunday, October 20, 2013
The World, The Ocean, and smaller
I just got back from a trip to do a play in Palm Springs. I didn't bring my computer, so for the most part I didn't look at facebook, or check the news. Occasionally I did so with my phone, but I tried to vacate. I'm not very good at it. It takes a few days to get in the groove of relaxing, and we really only had a couple days without rehearsal, and those had shows. It was nice spending time with people, and getting to know the cast more. My boyfriend was able to tag along, as I had my own room, so that was nice as well. I notice, though, once again, that I'm not a champion relaxer.
It was nice, though, to take a bit of a break from the world. I'm not quite ready to go back to work tomorrow. I logged onto facebook and saw some great things, but also this upsetting article about the horrible state of our oceans. Do not read unless you like feeling sad and powerless.
I can only control my own little world. And really, I can't even control that. I can only be in it. I jumped on here today just to give my fingers some exercise and to run my brain a little. I'm not sure I even have a point, except that I can only be where I am.
I don't think I really missed facebook. It was nice to sit and actually chat with people. We had a couple of mornings around the pool, and some time around tables and meals. I feel fortunate that I have the chance to do things like this with great people.
The state of the ocean can make me despondent, but there is no point in despair. If anything, I'm learning that despair, depression, despondency, fatalism, complaint, anger have little solution embedded in them unless they spur you on to action.
I'm very sad about the ocean, but I can't wring my hands. I can possibly do some research and see what I can do, if anything.
Like I said, I don't really have a point. The world can be overwhelming. I know it's important to take the chance to step out of the usual every once in a while or my engine will be completely flooded, but it's also important to do things so that when I do step out, its worthwhile.
Or maybe it's time to notice that I'm looking at a four day trip with two days of rehearsal and three performances as a vacation.
Um. I think I'm tired. Good night.
It was nice, though, to take a bit of a break from the world. I'm not quite ready to go back to work tomorrow. I logged onto facebook and saw some great things, but also this upsetting article about the horrible state of our oceans. Do not read unless you like feeling sad and powerless.
I can only control my own little world. And really, I can't even control that. I can only be in it. I jumped on here today just to give my fingers some exercise and to run my brain a little. I'm not sure I even have a point, except that I can only be where I am.
I don't think I really missed facebook. It was nice to sit and actually chat with people. We had a couple of mornings around the pool, and some time around tables and meals. I feel fortunate that I have the chance to do things like this with great people.
The state of the ocean can make me despondent, but there is no point in despair. If anything, I'm learning that despair, depression, despondency, fatalism, complaint, anger have little solution embedded in them unless they spur you on to action.
I'm very sad about the ocean, but I can't wring my hands. I can possibly do some research and see what I can do, if anything.
Like I said, I don't really have a point. The world can be overwhelming. I know it's important to take the chance to step out of the usual every once in a while or my engine will be completely flooded, but it's also important to do things so that when I do step out, its worthwhile.
Or maybe it's time to notice that I'm looking at a four day trip with two days of rehearsal and three performances as a vacation.
Um. I think I'm tired. Good night.
Wednesday, October 09, 2013
Anger
I feel myself getting angry at the slightest little thing lately. I'm not really sure why, though I have my theories. They include: sugar, sleep, over-information and the inability to find an exit off the information super highway, powerlessness in the face of all that's happening around us on a day to day basis.
I'm sure any could be a culprit. I've had enough experience to know that anger unexpressed turns inward. I've had much experience in that. Anger turned outward feels ineffectual, though. I've always been frustrated by calm politicians, but I see that there is no solution in anger. It feels good, we need to get it out, but there is no common ground. There is nothing but scorched earth. Even when I express anger, I feel ridiculous about halfway through, and always feel the need to apologize. Lately I think it's just a surplus of information and nowhere to store it. Overwhelm and powerlessness. They're looking for a way out. Anger is the easiest way. There's no target; I'm not the kind of person who attacks anyone or anything. During a bout of this a few years ago I went to a batting cage and batted balls for an hour. That felt great. Exercise works, too. With the current yahoos in Congress stopping all discussion and blaming things on everyone but themselves, it's hard to even turn on the radio.
Meanwhile, I hear meditation helps.
I was amazed today at this young woman, Malala Yousafzai. I saw this clip of her on the Daily Show, explaining what she would think about being attacked, which she was, and the understanding she would show - that her first thought was anger, and then she reminded herself that anger would not help, only make her the same as her attacker. No wonder she may end up being the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. I know my problems do not compare to this, though they feel real nonetheless. I can only hope for some of her compassion and understanding, while also being grateful that I am not in a country where this threat is a daily reality.
I'm sure any could be a culprit. I've had enough experience to know that anger unexpressed turns inward. I've had much experience in that. Anger turned outward feels ineffectual, though. I've always been frustrated by calm politicians, but I see that there is no solution in anger. It feels good, we need to get it out, but there is no common ground. There is nothing but scorched earth. Even when I express anger, I feel ridiculous about halfway through, and always feel the need to apologize. Lately I think it's just a surplus of information and nowhere to store it. Overwhelm and powerlessness. They're looking for a way out. Anger is the easiest way. There's no target; I'm not the kind of person who attacks anyone or anything. During a bout of this a few years ago I went to a batting cage and batted balls for an hour. That felt great. Exercise works, too. With the current yahoos in Congress stopping all discussion and blaming things on everyone but themselves, it's hard to even turn on the radio.
Meanwhile, I hear meditation helps.
I was amazed today at this young woman, Malala Yousafzai. I saw this clip of her on the Daily Show, explaining what she would think about being attacked, which she was, and the understanding she would show - that her first thought was anger, and then she reminded herself that anger would not help, only make her the same as her attacker. No wonder she may end up being the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. I know my problems do not compare to this, though they feel real nonetheless. I can only hope for some of her compassion and understanding, while also being grateful that I am not in a country where this threat is a daily reality.
Monday, October 07, 2013
The Santa Ana's
I remember reading Janet Fitch's book "White Oleander" years ago. One of the motifs is the evocation of the Santa Ana winds, the hot, dusty winds that come through Southern California this time of year. I lived in New York then, which has no equivalent I can think of, except sudden inclement weather every month of the year, barring possibly a two week window at the end of April and beginning of May.
The Santa Ana's I know about now. They don't possess me to do crazy things like the characters in the book, rather they bring dust and pollen. It's more mundane, but it certainly has an effect. Once again, I am sneezing all day, even with allergy medication, and unsure if I will wake up tomorrow with a full-blown cold or feeling better. My check engine light went on yesterday, too, resulting in another bill for several hundred dollars on my car, the second time in as many months. I'm blaming it on the Santa Ana's.
On the bright side, I got to eat the slightly junky food I like when I have a cold - macaroni and cheese with peas and grocery store rotisserie chicken - while watching junk food TV. I also get to drive a rental car for two days, courtesy of my mechanic, which is pristine white and much cleaner than my car. I'm trying to find maybe something else with the wind - the hope and remembrance that things will blow over as quickly as they blew in. SoCal problems.
Ah- choo.
The Santa Ana's I know about now. They don't possess me to do crazy things like the characters in the book, rather they bring dust and pollen. It's more mundane, but it certainly has an effect. Once again, I am sneezing all day, even with allergy medication, and unsure if I will wake up tomorrow with a full-blown cold or feeling better. My check engine light went on yesterday, too, resulting in another bill for several hundred dollars on my car, the second time in as many months. I'm blaming it on the Santa Ana's.
On the bright side, I got to eat the slightly junky food I like when I have a cold - macaroni and cheese with peas and grocery store rotisserie chicken - while watching junk food TV. I also get to drive a rental car for two days, courtesy of my mechanic, which is pristine white and much cleaner than my car. I'm trying to find maybe something else with the wind - the hope and remembrance that things will blow over as quickly as they blew in. SoCal problems.
Ah- choo.
Tuesday, October 01, 2013
West Hollywood Book Fair
I went to the fair on Sunday. The West Hollywood Book Fair. I always enjoy it, as it's smaller than the UCLA/USC book fair, and I also know a lot more people involved.
I swung by my friend Charles' booth for Bloom, his award-winning literary journal. I ran into the effervescent Paul McCullough, who was facilitating Q & A's for the food stage and also signing his new book on Roma tomatoes called Roma Therapy. Eduardo Santiago was signing his new book Midnight Rumba as well. I also saw someone I know who was playing keyboard for a friend of his doing a piece on the poetry stage and I helped him move the keyboard from his car. So I like this one, as I end up knowing people from around. Even though I don't live in Weho, it feels neighborhood-y.
The people I didn't know (though turns out a couple are connected to other people I know, since the world is very small) were the ones whose panel I went to on memoir and secrets. The panelists were Daniel Stern, the author of Swingland, his account of the Swinging subculture; Kimberly Rae Miller, the author of Coming Clean, her memoir of growing up with a hoarder as a father; and Aaron Hertzler, whose memoir Rapture Practice is about growing up gay in a fundamentalist Christian household. The talk was informative, and I'm interested in reading all three. Miller's seems a little more serious in tone, though Hertzler's book definitely deals with some weighty issues, though targeted to a young adult audience. Stern's is an interesting comic escapade/how-to manual, which is a fascinating hybrid. All three deal with writing something that is usually hidden or kept secret to varying degrees. There was talk of shame, or difficulty, in writing these things, and also how the others involved have reacted. It's an interesting topic with confessional or personal writing. I think of that Joan Didion quote that a writer is always selling someone out. I don't know that I'd agree with that, but it takes bravery to put one's own experience on a page, knowing that others involved will see themselves portrayed, possibly unflatteringly. Each of the authors had a story about that, as well as their own trepidation of putting something personal out there. Interesting factoid - they are all actors. Miller has a BFA in acting, and Hertlzer and Stern both have MFAs. The moderator, Dinah Lenney, is an actress, memoirist, and writing teacher as well. I bring it up as she did. Interesting coincidence.
I have an MFA, too - is a memoir in my future?
It was a nice afternoon. I'll go again. I would have loved to buy more books, but that's always the case. I need to get better at reading them all, too. One at a time, I guess. That's the way.
I swung by my friend Charles' booth for Bloom, his award-winning literary journal. I ran into the effervescent Paul McCullough, who was facilitating Q & A's for the food stage and also signing his new book on Roma tomatoes called Roma Therapy. Eduardo Santiago was signing his new book Midnight Rumba as well. I also saw someone I know who was playing keyboard for a friend of his doing a piece on the poetry stage and I helped him move the keyboard from his car. So I like this one, as I end up knowing people from around. Even though I don't live in Weho, it feels neighborhood-y.
The people I didn't know (though turns out a couple are connected to other people I know, since the world is very small) were the ones whose panel I went to on memoir and secrets. The panelists were Daniel Stern, the author of Swingland, his account of the Swinging subculture; Kimberly Rae Miller, the author of Coming Clean, her memoir of growing up with a hoarder as a father; and Aaron Hertzler, whose memoir Rapture Practice is about growing up gay in a fundamentalist Christian household. The talk was informative, and I'm interested in reading all three. Miller's seems a little more serious in tone, though Hertzler's book definitely deals with some weighty issues, though targeted to a young adult audience. Stern's is an interesting comic escapade/how-to manual, which is a fascinating hybrid. All three deal with writing something that is usually hidden or kept secret to varying degrees. There was talk of shame, or difficulty, in writing these things, and also how the others involved have reacted. It's an interesting topic with confessional or personal writing. I think of that Joan Didion quote that a writer is always selling someone out. I don't know that I'd agree with that, but it takes bravery to put one's own experience on a page, knowing that others involved will see themselves portrayed, possibly unflatteringly. Each of the authors had a story about that, as well as their own trepidation of putting something personal out there. Interesting factoid - they are all actors. Miller has a BFA in acting, and Hertlzer and Stern both have MFAs. The moderator, Dinah Lenney, is an actress, memoirist, and writing teacher as well. I bring it up as she did. Interesting coincidence.
I have an MFA, too - is a memoir in my future?
It was a nice afternoon. I'll go again. I would have loved to buy more books, but that's always the case. I need to get better at reading them all, too. One at a time, I guess. That's the way.
Monday, September 30, 2013
Patty Griffin
This is great news about Patty Griffin's Silver Bell.
I found these couple of paragraphs really interesting -
I found these couple of paragraphs really interesting -
"I love revisiting that time about myself now," Griffin says on vacation in Northern California. "I think it's good to have the songs rescued from that time. I think if you were involved and around those big, corporate takeovers where a beverage company decided it would be a good time to buy a record label, and you weren't doing what everybody knew to be popular at that very moment, you weren't given any respect whatsoever.
Case in point: Griffin recalls a meeting circa "Silver Bell"'s intended release with then-label group boss Jimmy Iovine where, "he basically told me, 'You have never made a good record,'" she says. "He handed me a copy of 'Beautiful Day,' which is a U2 record, and said, 'Take a listen to this. This is how you write a hit record.'"
She did end up writing a great song called "Heavenly Day" years later, though probably not based on that song. She has said it's probably the only truly happy song she's written, and that she wrote it for her dog. Love that.
I'm interested in that idea that because she hadn't had a big radio hit that she'd never made a great album. Her songs have been covered by many people, and she's incredibly well-respected. But what makes success? There are so many songs and artists that no one will ever remember who made lots of money off of a song, or even an album. But making songs that are emotionally resonant, touching, lasting, even hint at something truthful, is much more difficult, probably not as commercial. Certainly, for me, more important.
It's great when art and commerce merge. It doesn't always happen. I'm happy we get a chance to hear the whole thing redone, though now I'll cherish my bootleg copy.
Thursday, September 26, 2013
The Paint Job
I did this short for the two women who call themselves Two Funny Brains, who I believe are also bloggers of BernThis.com, and SanDiegoMomma.com, for their female moments series. It was fun to do. A little improv at the end, and people think it's entertaining.
I'm a little crazed time-wise right now, but thought I'd share while I'm thinking of something thoughtful to write.
Sunday, September 22, 2013
Aaron Smith and his studio
This afternoon I went for a studio preview visit to see some of Aaron Smith's new paintings for his upcoming New York show "Past the Pillars of Hercules."
The last is a detail of the middle portrait, "Fallalish." The top is "Pother." A lot of his work is from 19th century photographs. I love the thick paint and the use of color. They're quite striking in person as well. He's running prints of the middle piece, which I'm assuming are part of his bearded blokes work. I've loved them for quite a while, and he is producing a small run (50) of signed prints of "Fallalish." I'm not a collector, but it would be great to have a print.
One other great thing about the studio visit was the studio itself. Aaron himself is a affable fellow, and the space is great.
This is a picture I took, but you can see more of the artist and his studio here. I spoke with a few people who had the same sentiment I did - wouldn't it be great to have a studio? Preferably one like this, with exposed brick, clean, well maintained with lots of light. I probably wouldn't paint, but who knows? The supplies are incredibly enticing. Wouldn't it be nice, though, to have a little separate space given only to creation?
The paintings are on display at Sloan Fine Art in New York from October 26th - November 17th. Visit them, and buy one for me.
The last is a detail of the middle portrait, "Fallalish." The top is "Pother." A lot of his work is from 19th century photographs. I love the thick paint and the use of color. They're quite striking in person as well. He's running prints of the middle piece, which I'm assuming are part of his bearded blokes work. I've loved them for quite a while, and he is producing a small run (50) of signed prints of "Fallalish." I'm not a collector, but it would be great to have a print.
One other great thing about the studio visit was the studio itself. Aaron himself is a affable fellow, and the space is great.
This is a picture I took, but you can see more of the artist and his studio here. I spoke with a few people who had the same sentiment I did - wouldn't it be great to have a studio? Preferably one like this, with exposed brick, clean, well maintained with lots of light. I probably wouldn't paint, but who knows? The supplies are incredibly enticing. Wouldn't it be nice, though, to have a little separate space given only to creation?
The paintings are on display at Sloan Fine Art in New York from October 26th - November 17th. Visit them, and buy one for me.
Friday, September 20, 2013
Scheduling
I have a little problem being busy. I've had it for a while. I love the idea of not being busy, but sadly I'm not so good at the practice of it.
I am getting better, though. This weekend I'm taking my boyfriend to the Sing-a-long Sound of Music at the Bowl, as he's never been to the bowl. Sunday, I am going to an art show preview, and then to the birthday dinner for the dear daughter of my dearest friend.
I'm saying this because I have tonight, all day tomorrow, and most of Sunday free. Next week, I have something every night, including two day-long events I'm stage managing. I do another October 5th. Then I'm performing at a reading for a friend's fundraiser on the 15th (hopefully minimal rehearsal), followed by leaving town on the 16th for four days to put up a play in Palm Springs that weekend.
In the meantime, I've given myself a writing deadline. I know I can meet it. I also have a writing group meeting in there somewhere. If you want something done, they say, give it to a busy person. Is that why I keep saying yes?
Things will slow down. That will probably make me antsy. In the meantime, I need to remember that there is more than enough time - people do what I'm doing and have families. People direct movies, put up TV shows, run political campaigns. This is really nothing.
I'm writing this to remind myself of a truism - If I stay in the moment, time expands. There is always enough. If I'm already worried about October and it feels like I'm close to Thanksgiving already, then it's going to be a crazed couple of months.
I took a yoga class at lunch, and remembered I need to breathe. There is space. There is time. What's the rush?
I am getting better, though. This weekend I'm taking my boyfriend to the Sing-a-long Sound of Music at the Bowl, as he's never been to the bowl. Sunday, I am going to an art show preview, and then to the birthday dinner for the dear daughter of my dearest friend.
I'm saying this because I have tonight, all day tomorrow, and most of Sunday free. Next week, I have something every night, including two day-long events I'm stage managing. I do another October 5th. Then I'm performing at a reading for a friend's fundraiser on the 15th (hopefully minimal rehearsal), followed by leaving town on the 16th for four days to put up a play in Palm Springs that weekend.
In the meantime, I've given myself a writing deadline. I know I can meet it. I also have a writing group meeting in there somewhere. If you want something done, they say, give it to a busy person. Is that why I keep saying yes?
Things will slow down. That will probably make me antsy. In the meantime, I need to remember that there is more than enough time - people do what I'm doing and have families. People direct movies, put up TV shows, run political campaigns. This is really nothing.
I'm writing this to remind myself of a truism - If I stay in the moment, time expands. There is always enough. If I'm already worried about October and it feels like I'm close to Thanksgiving already, then it's going to be a crazed couple of months.
I took a yoga class at lunch, and remembered I need to breathe. There is space. There is time. What's the rush?
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
10,000 Hours
Today was one of those days. I got a little down-in-the-dumps. It happens. I had acupuncture and went into such a deep sleep that I forgot where I was. This after a night where I had a dream with Shelley Long and Bette Davis, whom I don't believe actually appeared together in real life. The dream, as you might imagine, was incredibly disturbing, even without telling you that Bette Davis at one point replaced her face with a gray and green metal plate made of a speaker like an old speaker phone console while admonishing, "No one ever said it was going to be easy."
Anyhow, after the grogginess of another appointment with my acupuncturist, who told me once again how sensitive and stressed I am (thanks for that information - I live in it, I am aware), I was reading yet another article that referred to Malcolm Gladwell's 10,000 hour rule of expertise. It's the theory a la mode apparently, the ice cream that accompanies every slice of humble pie. Since I am trying something new in hopes of turning into into something possibly lucrative at some point (am I being vague enough?), I am a little sensitive to theories of how long it takes to learn something. 10,000 hours is approximately 4.807 years of 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year. At my current rate, I would be close to expert by the time I am eligible for AARP. The date is encroaching - I am currently thinking they have sent mail to me in error. The information did not lighten my mood.
Then I remembered: no one knows anything for certain. There is always a little crack of hope. I'm not even looking for expert; I'm looking for capable. How many hours to perfectly solid and acceptable?
I've been guilty of looking around the web at these "10 things you should _____ to be ____" articles and the like. Some of them end up discouraging while trying to be encouraging, giving me an excuse to compare myself to someone else's experience. Reading about Tina Fey's 10 Emmy's by the time she was 40 did not help the mood. If I'm going for anything, though, I have to go for myself. I'll end up, like everyone before me, charting my own path with the encouragement of others. With their discouragement, too. I can even choose which to listen to. There's no article telling me the 10 things I should do to be my best self, I can only find that out by exploring. Practicing, and failing.
Does this count toward my 10,000 hours?
Anyhow, after the grogginess of another appointment with my acupuncturist, who told me once again how sensitive and stressed I am (thanks for that information - I live in it, I am aware), I was reading yet another article that referred to Malcolm Gladwell's 10,000 hour rule of expertise. It's the theory a la mode apparently, the ice cream that accompanies every slice of humble pie. Since I am trying something new in hopes of turning into into something possibly lucrative at some point (am I being vague enough?), I am a little sensitive to theories of how long it takes to learn something. 10,000 hours is approximately 4.807 years of 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year. At my current rate, I would be close to expert by the time I am eligible for AARP. The date is encroaching - I am currently thinking they have sent mail to me in error. The information did not lighten my mood.
Then I remembered: no one knows anything for certain. There is always a little crack of hope. I'm not even looking for expert; I'm looking for capable. How many hours to perfectly solid and acceptable?
I've been guilty of looking around the web at these "10 things you should _____ to be ____" articles and the like. Some of them end up discouraging while trying to be encouraging, giving me an excuse to compare myself to someone else's experience. Reading about Tina Fey's 10 Emmy's by the time she was 40 did not help the mood. If I'm going for anything, though, I have to go for myself. I'll end up, like everyone before me, charting my own path with the encouragement of others. With their discouragement, too. I can even choose which to listen to. There's no article telling me the 10 things I should do to be my best self, I can only find that out by exploring. Practicing, and failing.
Does this count toward my 10,000 hours?
Sunday, September 15, 2013
Can I get a cynical amen?
I took a yoga class with a friend today. We thought we were going to make it to a class we used to go to, but it wasn't being held, so we looked up another place on line. She mentioned a place in Larchmont that now was 9 locations, including one they have taken over from the owners in West Hollywood that was quite a popular studio. Now it's one of these.
The class was $22, which felt steep to me, and the cheerless Lena Dunham doppleganger took my money she was all business. I may have grumbled about the price a little. Or expressed my shock. I don't know why - it's an hour and a half, and I think most hour classes I've taken are around $15, so that's the going market rate. I think it was the chain aspect that had me prejudiced before I walked in.
I'm not saying it's a good characteristic, I'm just saying I noticed it.
On the door on the way out they have their rating at the number one yoga studio in town from a local review source, with the opening line, "If yoga was taught in a factory..."
My mother recommended Deepak Chopra's novelization of the life of Buddha called "Buddha" the other day. My brother read it as well. I just can't. It's the story of the Buddha. Why do I need Deepak Chopra's vision of it? It's probably wonderful. I'm sure Oprah's read it. I bet they've had deep talks about about it. In fact, his name sounds like "Deep talk."
I haven't written much on this blog about what I would call spiritual materialism, or the idea that if you are wealthy, or in line with the Universe, wealth will come your way. It's a uniquely American idea. I think it's deeply ingrained here. I don't know what that has to do with Deepak Chopra writing another book or spending $22 for a yoga class, but they all feel intertwined. I could just be tired.
This serenity is big business, no?
The class was $22, which felt steep to me, and the cheerless Lena Dunham doppleganger took my money she was all business. I may have grumbled about the price a little. Or expressed my shock. I don't know why - it's an hour and a half, and I think most hour classes I've taken are around $15, so that's the going market rate. I think it was the chain aspect that had me prejudiced before I walked in.
I'm not saying it's a good characteristic, I'm just saying I noticed it.
On the door on the way out they have their rating at the number one yoga studio in town from a local review source, with the opening line, "If yoga was taught in a factory..."
My mother recommended Deepak Chopra's novelization of the life of Buddha called "Buddha" the other day. My brother read it as well. I just can't. It's the story of the Buddha. Why do I need Deepak Chopra's vision of it? It's probably wonderful. I'm sure Oprah's read it. I bet they've had deep talks about about it. In fact, his name sounds like "Deep talk."
I haven't written much on this blog about what I would call spiritual materialism, or the idea that if you are wealthy, or in line with the Universe, wealth will come your way. It's a uniquely American idea. I think it's deeply ingrained here. I don't know what that has to do with Deepak Chopra writing another book or spending $22 for a yoga class, but they all feel intertwined. I could just be tired.
This serenity is big business, no?
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Tonight
I am so excited, thrilled, proud. I just bought a lot of flowers.We made lists, we worked out places for everyone to be and duties for the night.
I know it will be wonderful. And I'm equally happy I didn't try to bake a cake for it. The thought occurred. I let it pass. Or perhaps in the flurry of activity, I forgot to. Either way, smart choice.
The book is beautiful, the people are beautiful, the space that we got by luck and kindness when our other one fizzled is more than could be hoped for. I think everyone will have a wonderful time.
I hope they all go home happy, to read the book. And tell a few friends.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
We are what we eat
About 18 months ago, or January or February of 2012, I went to the doctor and found out I had borderline to high cholesterol and very high triglycerides. He wanted to put me on medication, but I asked for one last chance to try diet, as my mother had had good results with a Mediterranean diet. I stopped eating sugar, processed foods, and most bread. I watched my portion sizes. I couldn't exercise as I was healing from sinus surgery for about 6 weeks. By April, I had lost 20 pounds, my cholesterol was down 100 points, and my triglycerides 300. I felt great. Kept exercising. Lost 35 pounds by June and kept it off.
Until...
I did the AIDS ride this June, and I've gained 15 pounds in 2 months. While you're training, you eat whatever you want. I sadly kept going, and quit exercising as much. I also threw away my "fat pants" so the only jeans I have are so tight around the middle that my car key left an indent in my leg today.
I really don't want to buy new pants.
This afternoon I decided to have a candy bar. I can't remember the last time I had a whole candy bar. This was around 4.
By 6 o'clock I was wondering why my life was so awful and why I was alive.
Now, I know sugar has this effect on me. It has my whole life. Stopping it threw that into relief. I had had no idea before, but I can feel a direct connection between sugar and my mood. I can also see it in any child on the street. So why is it so hard to stop it again? I don't know, but I think I'm near the end of it.
Tonight I came home, scrounged for some legumes and corn chips (bachelor meal), while I made a pork, green chile, sweet potato stew. I had a little bowl. I feel much better.
It's so simple. Why is it necessary to find it out again? Whatever the reason, I have a wonderful stew for the rest of the week. I can steer clear of the candy bars.
Monday, September 09, 2013
Abromovic
In 2010 I saw "The Artist is Present", the Marina Abromovic retrospective at MoMA in New York. I took notes, as I usually do at museums, and promptly ignored them, as I usually do as well. Since that time, there has been an HBO documentary, "The Artist is Present'" as well as this video, which went viral. This video made me want to revisit my thoughts.
I wasn't familiar with Ambrovic's work. I studied performance art in college pretty extensively, seeing and studying work by Karen Finley, Leonora Champagne, Rachel Rosenthal among others. In my mind performance artists are disproportionately female. I'm sure there's something in there for a thesis one day, but I know most of the artists I think of are female. My exposure, though, was mostly on the "performance" side than the "art" side, and since I was studying in a theater department, the performance artists I studied and read were theater artists as well, bringing a slight sense of a gallery to the theatre. Abromovic brings the performance to the gallery, and falls more to the "art" side that than the performance/monologuist side.
I just found my notes from 2010, some inscrutable, as standing while writing in a small book does not make for legible cursive; even on a good day I sometimes can't read what I've written, but here are a sample of the notes, and I'll move them into something cohesive, I'm hoping....
People running up the stairs and MoMa when it opens ( I didn't realize at the time they were all getting in line for the chance to sit across from Abromovic in her red dress)
Performance art - Idea and self direction. I have some burr in my saddle about art being illustrative of an idea, especially when it feels like there needs to be an intermediary. I felt a little lost at the start, but the overall feel of the exhibit made me feel how self-directed performance art is. Yes, Virginia, it took me twenty years to figure out that people on a stage or in a museum either talking about themselves or using themselves as an object was essentially self-directed.
Seeing Abromovic's collected work re-staged with other people as her stand-ins brings the self-direction to a different level. Her art is not so much about performing or exploring herself, but about endurance.
*****
...and that's as far as I had gotten on a draft that I was working on before I watched the documentary tonight. I've attempted over the past few months to rewrite it - I have pages of odd notes. Of course, the film made me very sad that I missed possibly the best thing about the show - the artist herself. I don't even know that I agree now with what I said above, but it's how I was organizing my thoughts until I saw the documentary.
What has been stuck in my mind, since I saw the video that made me want to revisit my notes, was a last line. I'll write it now, so it won't be last:
In the end, she has illuminated a most basic truth - All we have is another person, opposite us, looking back.
So now besides kicking myself for not having stood and watched what was happening, I'm kicking myself again for my response, which was more intellectual than emotional. It's usually that way with me at first; the emotion is the boom that follows once the plane has passed. The great thing is happening on the street and I turn away to order my lunch. Of course, in a retrospective space, with many gallery rooms and accompanying text, I went into museum mode. Not a surprise.
A friend told me when her son was eight that she read a book about that phase of development. All the 8 year old really needs, it said, was for the parent to spend time directly with them, to see them, to give them attention. Watching Ambromovic's "The Artist is Present" piece and documentary made me think how many people in the audience wanted to be seen. The emotion was overwhelming. People felt seen, it seems, and also felt seen while doing it. She spoke of the immense pain she felt from people. A great deal of the documentary was watching those powerful transactions. There was an 8 or 10 year old boy, who crouched down after in response, his mother coming up to him and bursting into tears, saying how proud she was of him. One woman tried to take her clothes off and sobbed when taken away. One man had a tattoo after seeing her 21 times.
For my part, I'm sure I thought at the time that it felt like so many acting exercises I'd done in countless classes, sitting in a chair opposite a partner, staring into his or her eyes, trying not to laugh, trying to be present. Her piece, though, in how present she was and for how long, seemed to achieve a kind of transcendence. It's the actual presence that is real, seductive, beautiful, naked, terrifying.
My first response to seeing this draft was to erase my earlier thoughts, replace them with the more current reaction after watching the video. But in the spirit of the show, I don't think I can do that. I've had a shift. I don't even know what I mean above about self-directed, except that it's exploration of a self and boundaries that challenges every viewer who sees it. Is it about the self then, or is it a bold challenge? I don't have an easy answer; I like that I don't have an easy answer. I even feel like saying what I think her art about is glib, and it makes me uncomfortable I even wrote it. No wonder I didn't post it. I do think, though, that watching her do something was probably different than watching the actors doing her pieces - I imagine it's like seeing a star in a play, the vibration is palpably different.
I am very regretful, though, that I didn't stay and see her for a while. I remember I went to MoMA to see the Tim Burton show, which in the end was exhaustive but not moving. I remember her show three years later, which must say something. I especially remember the piece she did for the biennale reenacted, in which she sat in a long red dress scouring the flesh off of a mountain of thousands of cow skulls to protest the Yugoslavian civil wars. I'm still amazed at that piece.
I have many reactions to the documentary - I could probably write another post about the film. The people, the faces, the emotions of everyone and what they were experiencing with her, from the ages of 8 to 80 it seems. Watching her piece was riveting. It's hard not to be open. It's incredible watching someone so fearless. I can have no response but to open my eyes, and look back.
Seeing Abromovic's collected work re-staged with other people as her stand-ins brings the self-direction to a different level. Her art is not so much about performing or exploring herself, but about endurance.
*****
...and that's as far as I had gotten on a draft that I was working on before I watched the documentary tonight. I've attempted over the past few months to rewrite it - I have pages of odd notes. Of course, the film made me very sad that I missed possibly the best thing about the show - the artist herself. I don't even know that I agree now with what I said above, but it's how I was organizing my thoughts until I saw the documentary.
What has been stuck in my mind, since I saw the video that made me want to revisit my notes, was a last line. I'll write it now, so it won't be last:
In the end, she has illuminated a most basic truth - All we have is another person, opposite us, looking back.
So now besides kicking myself for not having stood and watched what was happening, I'm kicking myself again for my response, which was more intellectual than emotional. It's usually that way with me at first; the emotion is the boom that follows once the plane has passed. The great thing is happening on the street and I turn away to order my lunch. Of course, in a retrospective space, with many gallery rooms and accompanying text, I went into museum mode. Not a surprise.
A friend told me when her son was eight that she read a book about that phase of development. All the 8 year old really needs, it said, was for the parent to spend time directly with them, to see them, to give them attention. Watching Ambromovic's "The Artist is Present" piece and documentary made me think how many people in the audience wanted to be seen. The emotion was overwhelming. People felt seen, it seems, and also felt seen while doing it. She spoke of the immense pain she felt from people. A great deal of the documentary was watching those powerful transactions. There was an 8 or 10 year old boy, who crouched down after in response, his mother coming up to him and bursting into tears, saying how proud she was of him. One woman tried to take her clothes off and sobbed when taken away. One man had a tattoo after seeing her 21 times.
For my part, I'm sure I thought at the time that it felt like so many acting exercises I'd done in countless classes, sitting in a chair opposite a partner, staring into his or her eyes, trying not to laugh, trying to be present. Her piece, though, in how present she was and for how long, seemed to achieve a kind of transcendence. It's the actual presence that is real, seductive, beautiful, naked, terrifying.
My first response to seeing this draft was to erase my earlier thoughts, replace them with the more current reaction after watching the video. But in the spirit of the show, I don't think I can do that. I've had a shift. I don't even know what I mean above about self-directed, except that it's exploration of a self and boundaries that challenges every viewer who sees it. Is it about the self then, or is it a bold challenge? I don't have an easy answer; I like that I don't have an easy answer. I even feel like saying what I think her art about is glib, and it makes me uncomfortable I even wrote it. No wonder I didn't post it. I do think, though, that watching her do something was probably different than watching the actors doing her pieces - I imagine it's like seeing a star in a play, the vibration is palpably different.
I am very regretful, though, that I didn't stay and see her for a while. I remember I went to MoMA to see the Tim Burton show, which in the end was exhaustive but not moving. I remember her show three years later, which must say something. I especially remember the piece she did for the biennale reenacted, in which she sat in a long red dress scouring the flesh off of a mountain of thousands of cow skulls to protest the Yugoslavian civil wars. I'm still amazed at that piece.
I have many reactions to the documentary - I could probably write another post about the film. The people, the faces, the emotions of everyone and what they were experiencing with her, from the ages of 8 to 80 it seems. Watching her piece was riveting. It's hard not to be open. It's incredible watching someone so fearless. I can have no response but to open my eyes, and look back.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)